“An excellent upgrade to Apple's iconic true wireless earbuds.”
- Very good sound quality
- Wireless MagSafe charging
- Head-tracking spatial audio
- IPX4 water resistance
- Not great in noisy environments
Now that Apple has released its third-generation, $179 AirPods, youโre probably wondering, are they any good? If I own the first or second-gen AirPods, should I upgrade? And, is it still worth the extra money for the $249 AirPods Pro? Iโll save you some time.
The answers are, yes, yes, and maybe. Want to know more? Hereโs our full review.
In the Goldilocks zone
- 2. Apple AirPods (left), AirPods 3 (middle), and AirPods Pro.
The design of the third-gen AirPods — which we’ll now refer to as the AirPods 3 — for all intents and purposes makes them look like the missing link between the original AirPods and the AirPods Pro. That in-between impression is the story of the AirPods 3 in a nutshell: They take the best parts of each of those other models in an attempt to create the perfect middle ground, with that same in-between price. If this was Appleโs goal, I think it succeeded wildly.
Fans of semi-open earbuds no longer have to accept mediocre sound quality.
The AirPods 3 sit firmly in the Goldilocks zone — they improve on the second-gen AirPods in every meaningful way, while coming in at a lower price than you used to have to pay for the second-gen AirPods with wireless charging, and considerably less than the AirPods Pro at their regular price.
Even their charging case is a best-of-both-worlds situation, with Qi and MagSafe-compatible wireless charging and yet with dimensions that make it almost exactly the same size and shape as the original AirPods case.
Bigger, better sound
The original AirPods earned a lot of fans for their wire-free convenience, simplicity, and easy integration with the iPhone. But most would admit that when it comes to sound quality, theyโre OK at best — barely an improvement over the performance of the wired EarPods that Apple ships with its iPhones. And despite using a semi-open design, just like the original AirPods, the AirPods 3 sound far better.
Head-tracking spatial audio isย like sitting in on a studio session with your favorite band.
In fact, as long as youโre in a quiet location, the AirPods 3 sound every bit as good as the AirPods Pro. Thereโs plenty of clarity through the various frequencies and, much to my surprise, they have a bass response that is both warm and powerful. They canโt compete with closed designs like the Jabra Elite 7 Pro or Sonyโs WF-1000XM4, but I put them head-to-head with other semi-open buds like the AirPods, Marshall Minor III, Soundpeats Air 3, Urbanista Lisbon, and the Earin A3, and the AirPods 3 trounced them all. Fans of semi-open earbuds no longer have to accept mediocre sound quality.
Get spatial
Apple has been making a big deal about spatial audio and Dolby Atmos ever since it added tracks to Apple Music that use this immersive format. And while pretty much any set of wired or wireless headphones can enjoy Atmos when listening to select Apple Music songs, the AirPods 3 up the ante with head-tracking spatial audio.
The feature — which the new AirPods share with the AirPods Pro and AirPods Max — takes the already immersive quality of Dolby Atmos music and adjusts some of the song elements in real-time to react to your head movements. The lead vocalist(s) is โpinnedโ to the direction your head faces, such that when you turn your head one way or the other, that singerโs voice sounds like itโs still coming from the same forward direction. Itโs a little like sitting in on a studio session with your favorite band.
A more bulbous (yet super smooth) shape makes them more secure without compromising on comfort.
Like Dolby Atmos music itself, the effect can vary hugely from track to track. But when itโs done right, like on Imagine Dragonsโ new album Mercury – Act 1, itโs a wild ride. Older material that has been remixed for spatial audio, like The Rolling Stones classic, Tattoo You, doesnโt fare as well as newer works (sorry Mick and Keith).
This same head-tracking works on movie soundtracks too, and Iโd argue itโs an even better use of the tech as it can simulate what itโs like to sit in a full surround sound theater, using just your earbuds.
You may not use head-tracking spatial audio a lot (and you can disable it entirely if you donโt like the way it sounds) but itโs a cool feature that helps to justify the purchase of the AirPods 3 even when there are so many great true wireless earbuds out there.
Comfy curves
Another common complaint about the first AirPods is that even though theyโre very comfortable, they just donโt feel very secure in your ears. This, along with their lack of any official water or sweat protection, has kept some folks from using them for running or other high-impact activities.
The AirPods 3 manage to (mostly) address both concerns. With a more bulbous (yet super smooth) shape, they make much better contact with the skin of the outer ear and that — along with their shorter stem — makes them more secure without compromising on comfort. If you like the way the AirPods 2 fit, you should be quite happy with the AirPods 3. Theyโre not as secure as the AirPods Pro, which means you may need to adjust them periodically, especially if you use the force sensor controls a lot — pinching the stems to activate it can inadvertently move the earbuds around, especially while running.
But they do have an IPX4 rating for water resistance, so go ahead and get as sweaty as you please.
Find a nice, quiet spot
While the AirPods 3 sound quality really is remarkable given their semi-open design, with no silicone ear tips, they canโt provide much of a seal, and lots of external noise makes its way into your ears along with your music. In even moderately noisy environments, youโre forced to crank the volume to hear your podcasts or phone calls.
This is where the AirPods Pro have a huge advantage. Not only do they provide better passive noise isolation thanks to those silicone ear tips, but they also have active noise cancellation (ANC) which can silence all but the most intrusive outside sounds.
On the other hand, because the AirPods 3 let so much sound in, thereโs almost no reason to remove them to have a conversation, and thus the lack of transparency mode is no big deal. If you want to be more aware of your surroundings, simply pause the music.
Competent calling
Call quality on the original AirPods was never perfect, but it was always perfectly adequate. That remains true of the AirPods 3. You should have no trouble being heard even in moderately noisy places. Clarity isnโt quite as good as youโll get with the AirPods Pro, but itโs good enough for most situations.
A slightly bigger battery
Weโve taken Apple to task over the AirPods and AirPods Pro battery life because so many other true wireless earbuds manage to offer longer play time on a single charge and more total battery time too. So itโs great to see that Apple has managed to eke out just a bit more from the AirPods 3โs battery: Six hours per charge, and 30 hours of total time when you factor in the charging case.
Thatโs still shy of some of the more long-lasting earbuds, but itโs still the best weโve seen in a set of AirPods. Given that they still support hands-free Siri (one of the biggest draws on battery life), itโs a pretty big accomplishment.
The fast-charge feature gives you about an extra hour of listening time if you charge the buds for five minutes.
Our take
With way better sound, a bigger battery, a more secure fit, wireless charging, and head-tracking spatial audio, the AirPods 3 are a big step-up from the second-gen AirPods and an upgrade that all AirPod owners should consider.
Is there a better alternative?
The only set of semi-open earbuds that sound as good as the AirPods 3 are the Oddict Twigs. However, they lack wireless charging, head-tracking spatial audio, hands-free Siri, and their three-hour battery life is among the lowest weโve ever seen.
A better alternative is the first-gen Apple AirPods Pro, which you can still routinely find on sale for between $180-$200 (the updated version with MagSafe charging may cost a few dollars more). With ANC and transparency mode, a more secure fit, and better sound, theyโre the logical step-up from the AirPods 3. But a lot of folks donโt like the feeling of silicone ear tips, which brings us back to the AirPods 3.
How long will they last?
With IPX4 water protection and very solid build quality, Iโm certain the hardware itself will last for many years of use. But Apple has had problems in the past with the batteries in its AirPods losing a lot of their capacity in the first two years. I canโt say if Appleโs new optimized battery charging feature will significantly reduce this issue, so if youโre concerned about it, it might be worth buying Apple Care to extend your warranty from one year to two years.
Should you buy them?
If youโre an Apple device user, absolutely. The AirPods 3 are a worthy upgrade from the first AirPods. Android owners wonโt be able to take advantage of features like head-tracking spatial audio or hands-free Siri, making them less appealing for thse folks.
Editors' Recommendations
- Bluetooth on Sonos’ new Era speakers isn’t what you think โ it’s better
- The first Roku-made televisions are now available at Best Buy
- The best wireless headphones for 2023: which should you buy?
- The best noise-canceling headphones of 2023: Sony, Bowers & Wilkins, and more
- Best headphones for 2023: Sony, Sennheiser, Apple, and more
